Geek News: New Flap About Archaeopteryx

Was it a bird-like dinosaur or a dinosaur-like bird?  There's a new debate as some paleontologists re-classify Archaeopteryx, long thought to be the first bird in the fossil record. (And for once I get to use the "Great Moments in Research" tag unironically, yay!)

See the new article in Nature.  Since I'm a nerd, here's some citation info: 

"An Archaeopteryx-like theropod from China and the origin of Avialae," by Xing Xu, Hailu You, Kai Du & Fenglu Han. Nature 475, 465–470 (28 July 2011). Received 16 November 2010, accepted 10 June 2011, published online 27 July 2011.

I give you the abstract after the fold:

Archaeopteryx is widely accepted as being the most basal bird, and accordingly it is regarded as central to understanding avialan origins; however, recent discoveries of derived maniraptorans have weakened the avialan status of Archaeopteryx. Here we report a new Archaeopteryx-like theropod from China. This find further demonstrates that many features formerly regarded as being diagnostic of Avialae, including long and robust forelimbs, actually characterize the more inclusive group Paraves (composed of the avialans and the deinonychosaurs). Notably, adding the new taxon into a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis shifts Archaeopteryx to the Deinonychosauria. Despite only tentative statistical support, this result challenges the centrality of Archaeopteryx in the transition to birds. If this new phylogenetic hypothesis can be confirmed by further investigation, current assumptions regarding the avialan ancestral condition will need to be re-evaluated.