Nerd Analysis: Free-Market Economists Consider The Financial Crisis
Free-marketeer scholars from Princeton, Columbia, Chicago, and Stanford weigh in. Definitely worth a read. Here's a blurb (my emphasis in boldface):
Every economist I interviewed agreed that ballooning American and European debt poses a huge threat to long-term prosperity. The debt will be paid either through inflation, which would make everyone poorer, or—a far better scenario—through economic growth that would increase both individual and government revenues. Unfortunately, by increasing taxes and imposing the wrong regulations, Western governments are hindering entrepreneurship and hence growth, Cochrane [that's John Cochrane of the University of Chicago -- MM] says.
As in the 1930s and 1970s, so today: crises are a serious problem, but misguided economic policy makes them worse. After the 1930s, only war production could overcome the negative economic consequences of the New Deal. After the stagflation of the 1970s, it took the bold leadership of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan to reorient the West toward free markets and prosperity. How long will it take this time before governments understand that overreacting to the crisis and imposing disproved Keynesian remedies will dampen and delay economic recovery?
1 comment:
If the government got returns at 150% why stop at 1 trillion stimulus why not 10 trillion?
Post a Comment